Samir Khan and Al Qaeda
Samir Khan is an active pro-Al Qaeda blogger. Learn more about Samir ibn Zafar Khan and participate in the debate about his writings.
New York Times starts debate about Samir Khan
Pretty interesting debate about the blogosphere's responsibility and tone regarding terrorism and political opinion.
Linked from http://www.slate.com/id/2175996/
---
A New York Times piece on the rise of English-language Web sites promoting Islamist views profiles a young Saudi-born Muslim who spreads jihadist messages from his parents' North Carolina home. Saudi-born Samir Khan translates Arabic videos into English and posts bloody insurgent videos from Iraq. Bloggers argue with the New York Times' assertion that there is no evidence that Khan, who has no affiliation with al-Qaida, has broken any laws.
Linked from http://www.slate.com/id/2175996/
---
A New York Times piece on the rise of English-language Web sites promoting Islamist views profiles a young Saudi-born Muslim who spreads jihadist messages from his parents' North Carolina home. Saudi-born Samir Khan translates Arabic videos into English and posts bloody insurgent videos from Iraq. Bloggers argue with the New York Times' assertion that there is no evidence that Khan, who has no affiliation with al-Qaida, has broken any laws.
Comments
USCS Const. Art. III, ยง 3, Cl 1
Sec. 3, Cl 1. Treason.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Please explain to me how this fool is not committing treason under the Constitutional definition? Is he not "aiding" our enemies by publishing thier "bloody insurgent videos" and supporting their cause? Does it not "spread" terror in doing so, thus giving aid again to our enemies who wish to strike fear in our hearts?
He should be dealt with severely under the law.
Sec. 3, Cl 1. Treason.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Please explain to me how this fool is not committing treason under the Constitutional definition? Is he not "aiding" our enemies by publishing thier "bloody insurgent videos" and supporting their cause? Does it not "spread" terror in doing so, thus giving aid again to our enemies who wish to strike fear in our hearts?
He should be dealt with severely under the law.
About the Author
275 Kudos
+ Kudo
People in Pictures
Top Current Events Articles
 |
Ulysses Milana Drops 140 Pounds to Join Marines
Recruiters told him he was too fat, so he did a one-year-long 'Rocky' style montage and came out 140-lbs lighter.
|
 |
Priest Orders Parishioners to Repent for Obama Votes
He calls a vote for Obama "material cooperation with intrinsic evil."
|
 |
27-Year-Old Teacher Charged in Child-Sex Case
The Colorado woman is the latest in a string of similar arrests.
|
Popular Current Events Zines
